On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 04:37:01PM +0206, John Ogness wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Sorry for the late response here. I am now trying to actually use this > series. > > On 2022-09-29, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig > > index d471d22a5e21..f53ad63b2bc6 100644 > > --- a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig > > +++ b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig > > @@ -72,6 +72,9 @@ config TREE_SRCU > > help > > This option selects the full-fledged version of SRCU. > > > > You are missing a: > > +config ARCH_HAS_NMI_SAFE_THIS_CPU_OPS > + bool > + > > Otherwise there is no CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_NMI_SAFE_THIS_CPU_OPS, so for > example CONFIG_NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE always ends up with y on X86. Good catch, thank you! Pulling this in with attribution. Thanx, Paul > > +config NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE > > + def_bool HAVE_NMI && !ARCH_HAS_NMI_SAFE_THIS_CPU_OPS && !TINY_SRCU > > + > > John
