On Sun, Oct 16, 2022 at 11:16 AM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 10:47:50PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 08:46:06AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 11:19:28AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote: > > > > I agree with the discussion, though if all CBs are in the bypass list, > > > > the patch will also save 2 jiffies. > > > > > > > > So just commit messages that need rework then? This one can be taken instead: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/rcu/21ECDA9F-81B1-4D22-8B03-020FB5DADA4F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#m14d21fbce23539a521693a4184b28ddc55d7d2c5 > > > > > > This one looks plausible to me. > > > > With the following modified diff (passed 25 hours of TREE01): > > Very good! > > Could one of you (presumably Joel) please send v9? > > Just to avoid me getting the wrong patch in the wrong place or similar. > Or mangling the required rebase following a pull (otherwise, as soon as I > create branches, Stephen Rothwell notes the lack of a committer signoff.) Taking a break from raking leaves so doing it right now! Those leaves! - Joel
