Re: [PATCH] rcu: remove rcu_is_idle_cpu

[Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@xxxxxxxxxx>]

在 2022/9/28 2:51, Paul E. McKenney 写道:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 10:36:29PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 09:58:27AM +0800, Yipeng Zou wrote:
> > > The commit "x86/cpu: Avoid cpuinfo-induced IPIing of idle CPUs" introduce
> > > this function to identify the current CPU idle state.
> > > But after commit "x86/aperfmperf: Replace arch_freq_get_on_cpu()" we
> > > just use MAX_SAMPLE_AGE to do that, So there is no use of this function.
> > >
> > > Fixes: f3eca381bd49 ("x86/aperfmperf: Replace arch_freq_get_on_cpu()")
> > > Signed-off-by: Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Good eyes, Yipeng!  Queued and pushed, thank you both!
>
> As usual, I could not resist the urge to wordsmith, so please check the
> patch below and let me know if I messed something up.

Its all good, and thanks for review.

> And please include both commit IDs in future patches with the
> formatting shows below.  Makes it easier for me to accept your
> patches, after all.  ;-)
ok，got it.
> 							Thanx, Paul
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> commit f8b389c24cf9a523472e3e505815b26f0174856c
> Author: Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Mon Sep 26 09:58:27 2022 +0800
>
>      rcu: Remove rcu_is_idle_cpu()
>      
>      The commit 3fcd6a230fa7 ("x86/cpu: Avoid cpuinfo-induced IPIing of
>      idle CPUs") introduced rcu_is_idle_cpu() in order to identify the
>      current CPU idle state.  But commit f3eca381bd49 ("x86/aperfmperf:
>      Replace arch_freq_get_on_cpu()") switched to using MAX_SAMPLE_AGE,
>      so rcu_is_idle_cpu() is no longer used.  This commit therefore removes it.
>      
>      Fixes: f3eca381bd49 ("x86/aperfmperf: Replace arch_freq_get_on_cpu()")
>      Signed-off-by: Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
>      Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
>      Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/rcutiny.h b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
> index 84e930c11065..93485b812712 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rcutiny.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
> @@ -146,8 +146,6 @@ static inline void rcu_virt_note_context_switch(void) { }
>   static inline void rcu_cpu_stall_reset(void) { }
>   static inline int rcu_jiffies_till_stall_check(void) { return 21 * HZ; }
>   static inline void rcu_irq_exit_check_preempt(void) { }
> -#define rcu_is_idle_cpu(cpu) \
> -	(is_idle_task(current) && !in_nmi() && !in_hardirq() && !in_serving_softirq())
>   static inline void exit_rcu(void) { }
>   static inline bool rcu_preempt_need_deferred_qs(struct task_struct *t)
>   {
> diff --git a/include/linux/rcutree.h b/include/linux/rcutree.h
> index 3066e0975022..f41c4ab2a884 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rcutree.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcutree.h
> @@ -87,8 +87,6 @@ bool poll_state_synchronize_rcu_full(struct rcu_gp_oldstate *rgosp);
>   void cond_synchronize_rcu(unsigned long oldstate);
>   void cond_synchronize_rcu_full(struct rcu_gp_oldstate *rgosp);
>   
> -bool rcu_is_idle_cpu(int cpu);
> -
>   #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU
>   void rcu_irq_exit_check_preempt(void);
>   #else
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index 1930cee1ccdb..96d678c9cfb6 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -301,12 +301,6 @@ static bool rcu_dynticks_in_eqs(int snap)
>   	return !(snap & RCU_DYNTICKS_IDX);
>   }
>   
> -/* Return true if the specified CPU is currently idle from an RCU viewpoint.  */
> -bool rcu_is_idle_cpu(int cpu)
> -{
> -	return rcu_dynticks_in_eqs(rcu_dynticks_snap(cpu));
> -}
> -
>   /*
>    * Return true if the CPU corresponding to the specified rcu_data
>    * structure has spent some time in an extended quiescent state since

--
Regards,
Yipeng Zou