On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 04:30:06AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 12:46:34PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 11:00:36AM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote: > > > In kernels built with either CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL=y or > > > CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y, additional CPUs must be added to rcu_nocb_mask. > > > Except that kernels booted without the rcu_nocbs= will not have > > > allocated rcu_nocb_mask. And the current rcu_init_nohz() function uses > > > its need_rcu_nocb_mask and offload_all local variables to track the > > > rcu_nocb and nohz_full state. > > > > > > But there is a much simpler approach, namely creating a cpumask pointer > > > to track the default and then using cpumask_available() to check the > > > rcu_nocb_mask state. This commit takes this approach, thereby simplifying > > > and shortening the rcu_init_nohz() function. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Looks good, thanks! > > Queued and pushed, thank you all! And this time, actually queued the most recent version. Apologies for my confusion. Thanx, Paul
