On 9/1/2022 11:30 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > So I'm not entirely comfortable but I'm going to review the current patchset > anyway and once it lands -rcu I'll try to hack a quick !NOCB implementation > for measurements purpose. Sounds good, arguable the core implementation to use bypass list is not too complex or anything, and maybe you can generalize the bypass list for !NONCB as well and re-use most of the code. You will need a per-cpu list anyway (bypass or some other) to queue the CBs. In v1, we had a separate per-cpu list. Thanks for offering to review the patches, you guys really motivate me to work on it (I am currently on leave but still working on it). I'll be looking forward to getting that out soon. Yesterday was good progress. - Joel
