The run-time single-CPU grace-period optimization applies only to
kernels built with CONFIG_SMP=y && CONFIG_PREEMPTION=y that are running
on a single-CPU system. But a kernel intended for a single-CPU system
should instead be built with CONFIG_SMP=n, and in any case, single-CPU
systems running Linux no longer appear to be the common case. Plus this
optimization results in the rcu_gp_oldstate structure being half again
larger than it needs to be.
This commit therefore disables the run-time single-CPU grace-period
optimization, so that this optimization applies only during the
pre-scheduler portion of the boot sequence.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 40 +++++++++-------------------------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 5c46c0d34ef0d..5c4ec9dd4ce70 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3423,42 +3423,20 @@ void __init kfree_rcu_scheduler_running(void)
/*
* During early boot, any blocking grace-period wait automatically
- * implies a grace period. Later on, this is never the case for PREEMPTION.
+ * implies a grace period.
*
- * However, because a context switch is a grace period for !PREEMPTION, any
- * blocking grace-period wait automatically implies a grace period if
- * there is only one CPU online at any point time during execution of
- * either synchronize_rcu() or synchronize_rcu_expedited(). It is OK to
- * occasionally incorrectly indicate that there are multiple CPUs online
- * when there was in fact only one the whole time, as this just adds some
- * overhead: RCU still operates correctly.
+ * Later on, this could in theory be the case for kernels built with
+ * CONFIG_SMP=y && CONFIG_PREEMPTION=y running on a single CPU, but this
+ * is not a common case. Furthermore, this optimization would cause
+ * the rcu_gp_oldstate structure to expand by 50%, so this potential
+ * grace-period optimization is ignored once the scheduler is running.
*/
static int rcu_blocking_is_gp(void)
{
- int ret;
-
- // Invoking preempt_model_*() too early gets a splat.
- if (rcu_scheduler_active == RCU_SCHEDULER_INACTIVE ||
- preempt_model_full() || preempt_model_rt())
- return rcu_scheduler_active == RCU_SCHEDULER_INACTIVE;
+ if (rcu_scheduler_active != RCU_SCHEDULER_INACTIVE)
+ return false;
might_sleep(); /* Check for RCU read-side critical section. */
- preempt_disable();
- /*
- * If the rcu_state.n_online_cpus counter is equal to one,
- * there is only one CPU, and that CPU sees all prior accesses
- * made by any CPU that was online at the time of its access.
- * Furthermore, if this counter is equal to one, its value cannot
- * change until after the preempt_enable() below.
- *
- * Furthermore, if rcu_state.n_online_cpus is equal to one here,
- * all later CPUs (both this one and any that come online later
- * on) are guaranteed to see all accesses prior to this point
- * in the code, without the need for additional memory barriers.
- * Those memory barriers are provided by CPU-hotplug code.
- */
- ret = READ_ONCE(rcu_state.n_online_cpus) <= 1;
- preempt_enable();
- return ret;
+ return true;
}
/**
--
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23
