On 6/21/2022 3:50 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx>
When running KASAN with Tiny RCU (e.g. under ARCH=um, where
a working KASAN patch is now available), we don't get any
information on the original kfree_rcu() (or similar) caller
when a problem is reported, as Tiny RCU doesn't record this.
Add the recording, which required pulling kvfree_call_rcu()
out of line for the KASAN case since the recording function
(kasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc) is neither exported, nor
can we include kasan.h into rcutiny.h.
without KASAN, the patch has no size impact (ARCH=um kernel):
text data bss dec hex filename
6151515 4423154 33148520 43723189 29b29b5 linux
6151515 4423154 33148520 43723189 29b29b5 linux + patch
with KASAN, the impact on my build was minimal:
text data bss dec hex filename
13915539 7388050 33282304 54585893 340ea25 linux
13911266 7392114 33282304 54585684 340e954 linux + patch
-4273 +4064 +-0 -209
Acked-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/rcutiny.h | 11 ++++++++++-
kernel/rcu/tiny.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcutiny.h b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
index 5fed476f977f6..d84e13f2c3848 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutiny.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static inline void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
*/
extern void kvfree(const void *addr);
-static inline void kvfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
+static inline void __kvfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
{
if (head) {
call_rcu(head, func);
@@ -51,6 +51,15 @@ static inline void kvfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
kvfree((void *) func);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC
+void kvfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func);
+#else
+static inline void kvfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
+{
+ __kvfree_call_rcu(head, func);
+}
+#endif
+
void rcu_qs(void);
static inline void rcu_softirq_qs(void)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tiny.c b/kernel/rcu/tiny.c
index 340b3f8b090d4..58ff3721d975c 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tiny.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tiny.c
@@ -217,6 +217,20 @@ bool poll_state_synchronize_rcu(unsigned long oldstate)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(poll_state_synchronize_rcu);
+#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC
+void kvfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
+{
+ if (head) {
+ void *ptr = (void *) head - (unsigned long) func;
+
+ kasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc(ptr);
+ }
For the !head case; similar to Tree RCU's kvfree_call_rcu()
implementation, we do not need to record 'ptr' (which will be 'func')?
Thanks
Neeraj
+
+ __kvfree_call_rcu(head, func);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvfree_call_rcu);
+#endif
+
void __init rcu_init(void)
{
open_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ, rcu_process_callbacks);
