This commit fixed a typo in the srcu_node structure's ->srcu_have_cbs
comment. While in the area, redo a couple of comments to take advantage
of 100-character line lengths.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/srcutree.h | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/srcutree.h b/include/linux/srcutree.h
index cb1f4351e8baa..4025840ba9a38 100644
--- a/include/linux/srcutree.h
+++ b/include/linux/srcutree.h
@@ -47,11 +47,9 @@ struct srcu_data {
*/
struct srcu_node {
spinlock_t __private lock;
- unsigned long srcu_have_cbs[4]; /* GP seq for children */
- /* having CBs, but only */
- /* is > ->srcu_gq_seq. */
- unsigned long srcu_data_have_cbs[4]; /* Which srcu_data structs */
- /* have CBs for given GP? */
+ unsigned long srcu_have_cbs[4]; /* GP seq for children having CBs, but only */
+ /* if greater than ->srcu_gq_seq. */
+ unsigned long srcu_data_have_cbs[4]; /* Which srcu_data structs have CBs for given GP? */
unsigned long srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp; /* Furthest future exp GP. */
struct srcu_node *srcu_parent; /* Next up in tree. */
int grplo; /* Least CPU for node. */
--
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23
