On Mon, 2021-12-13 at 12:22 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > I was about to ack the patch but, should we really add code that isn't going to > be necessary before a long while? Yeah, I'm torn on that. In this case it's harmless enough and it makes the code reentrant in its own right instead of relying on the fact that the cpuhp code won't invoke it multiple times in parallel. So I think that's reasonable defensive programming.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
