On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 10:31:57PM +0530, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote:
>
>
> On 11/30/2021 9:51 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > While looping through the rnp's CPUs to IPI for an expedited grace
> > period, a first pass excludes the current CPU and the CPUs in dynticks
> > idle mode. The workqueue will report their QS on their behalf later.
> >
> > The second pass processes the IPIs and also ignores the current CPU,
> > assuming it has been previously included in the group of CPUs whose
> > QS are to be reported by the workqueue.
> >
> > Unfortunately the current CPU may have changed between the first and
> > second pass, due to the rnp lock being dropped, re-enabling preemption.
> > As a result the current CPU, if different in the second pass, may be
> > ignored by the expedited grace period. No IPI will be sent to it
> > so it won't be requested to report an expedited quiescent state.
> >
> > This ends up in an expedited grace period stall.
> >
> > Fix this with including the current CPU in the second round in the group
> > of CPUs to report a QS for by the workqueue.
> >
> > Fixes: b9ad4d6ed18e ("rcu: Avoid self-IPI in sync_rcu_exp_select_node_cpus()")
> > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
>
> Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Applied, thank you both!
Thanx, Paul
> Thanks
> Neeraj
>
>
> > kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> > index a96d17206d87..237a79989aba 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> > @@ -387,6 +387,7 @@ static void sync_rcu_exp_select_node_cpus(struct work_struct *wp)
> > continue;
> > }
> > if (get_cpu() == cpu) {
> > + mask_ofl_test |= mask;
> > put_cpu();
> > continue;
> > }
> >
