On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 5:47 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 02:46:02PM -0300, wander@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > From: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > If we use the module stall_cpu option, we may get a soft lockup warning > > if we also don't pass the stall_cpu_block option. > > > > We introduce the stall_no_softlockup option to avoid a soft lockup on > > cpu stall even if we don't use the stall_cpu_block option. > > > > Signed-off-by: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@xxxxxxxxxx> > > This looks plausible to me, though it would be good to hear others' > thoughts. In the meantime, could you please forward-port this to > the "dev" branch of the -rcu tree? > > https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/paulmck/rcutodo.html > > Thanx, Paul > Thank you for the feedback. I just sent a v2 against that applies to the aforementioned branch. Cheers, Wander [snip]
