Re: [PATCH] rcu/nocb: Extend checks for offloaded rdp by migrate_disable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 06:38:15PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Commit 3820b513a2e33 ("rcu/nocb: Detect unsafe checks for offloaded
> rdp") added checks for safe rdp usage in the nocb case.
> 
> On PREEMPT_RT this checks triggers in the
>  rcu_cpu_kthread() -> rcu_core() -> rcu_check_quiescent_state() ->
>   rcu_rdp_is_offloaded()
> 
> call chain. On !PREEMPT_RT this warnings is suppressed because rcu_core()
> is invoked with disabled BH which also disables preemption and
> "preemptible()" is part of the checks which are considered safe.
> On PREEMPT_RT disabling BH does not disable preemption and since there
> is no other criteria the warning triggers.
> 
> According to the mentioned commit the goal is to check if the rcu data
> pointer is "stable … and prevent from its value to be changed under us".
> My understanding is that this may happen if the task is preemptible and
> therefore free to be migrated to another CPU which would then lead to
> another value of `rcu_data'.
> One thing that has been overseen is that a task within a migrate-disable
> region (as on PREEMPT_RT with disabled BH) is fully preemptible but may
> not be migrated to another CPU which should be enough to guarantee that
> rdp remains stable.
> 
> Check also disabled migration of the task if the RCU data pointer is
> from current CPU. Put the whole check within an SMP ifdef block since
> without SMP there are not CPU migrations to worry about (also
> task_struct::migration_disabled is missing).
> 
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> I don't fully understand why the CPU-hotplug lock matters here but this
> is beside the point ;)

If I remember correctly, any attempt to change the offloaded state
must hold off CPU-hotplug operations.  So if the current thread is
holding off CPU-hotplug operations, no other thread can be doing
an offload or de-offload operation.

>  kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> index 0ff5e4fb933e7..d8a623ba7d243 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> @@ -57,16 +57,18 @@ static bool rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(struct rcu_data *rdp)
>  	 * timers have their own means of synchronization against the
>  	 * offloaded state updaters.
>  	 */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  	RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(
>  		!(lockdep_is_held(&rcu_state.barrier_mutex) ||
>  		  (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) && lockdep_is_cpus_held()) ||
>  		  rcu_lockdep_is_held_nocb(rdp) ||
>  		  (rdp == this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data) &&
> -		   !(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT) && preemptible())) ||
> +		   (!(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT) && preemptible()) ||


> +		    current->migration_disabled)) ||

How does this change interact with the one proposed by Valentin?

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210721115118.729943-3-valentin.schneider@xxxxxxx/

							Thanx, Paul

>  		  rcu_current_is_nocb_kthread(rdp)),
>  		"Unsafe read of RCU_NOCB offloaded state"
>  	);
> -
> +#endif
>  	return rcu_segcblist_is_offloaded(&rdp->cblist);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.32.0
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux