On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 06:18:12AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 09:09:04AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > ----- On Jul 13, 2021, at 12:16 AM, paulmck paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 08:56:45AM +0800, zhouzhouyi@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > >> From: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@xxxxxxxxx> > > >> > > >> Hi Paul, > > >> > > >> During my studying of RCU, I did a grep in the kernel source tree. > > >> I found there are 3 places where the macro name CONFIG_TASKS_RCU_TRACE > > >> should be CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU instead. > > >> > > >> Without memory fencing, the idle/userspace task inspection may not > > >> be so accurate. > > >> > > >> Thanks for your constant encouragement for my studying. > > >> > > >> Best Wishes > > >> Zhouyi > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Good eyes, and those could cause real bugs, so thank you! > > > > Hi Paul, > > > > This makes me wonder: what is missing testing-wise in rcutorture to > > catch those issues with testing before they reach mainline ? > > My guess: Running on weakly ordered architectures. ;-) And another guess: A tool that identifies use of Kconfig options that are not defined in any Kconfig* file. Thanx, Paul
