[PATCH 1/1] rcu: fix spelling mistakes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Fix some spelling mistakes in comments:
data-strcuture ==> data-structure
responsibilty ==> responsibility
interrrupts ==> interrupts

Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 6 +++---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c  | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
index 350ebf5051f9..311aa7b14830 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
@@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ DEFINE_RCU_TASKS(rcu_tasks, rcu_tasks_wait_gp, call_rcu_tasks, "RCU Tasks");
  * or transition to usermode execution.  As such, there are no read-side
  * primitives analogous to rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock() because
  * this primitive is intended to determine that all tasks have passed
- * through a safe state, not so much for data-strcuture synchronization.
+ * through a safe state, not so much for data-structure synchronization.
  *
  * See the description of call_rcu() for more detailed information on
  * memory ordering guarantees.
@@ -637,7 +637,7 @@ DEFINE_RCU_TASKS(rcu_tasks_rude, rcu_tasks_rude_wait_gp, call_rcu_tasks_rude,
  * there are no read-side primitives analogous to rcu_read_lock() and
  * rcu_read_unlock() because this primitive is intended to determine
  * that all tasks have passed through a safe state, not so much for
- * data-strcuture synchronization.
+ * data-structure synchronization.
  *
  * See the description of call_rcu() for more detailed information on
  * memory ordering guarantees.
@@ -1163,7 +1163,7 @@ static void exit_tasks_rcu_finish_trace(struct task_struct *t)
  * there are no read-side primitives analogous to rcu_read_lock() and
  * rcu_read_unlock() because this primitive is intended to determine
  * that all tasks have passed through a safe state, not so much for
- * data-strcuture synchronization.
+ * data-structure synchronization.
  *
  * See the description of call_rcu() for more detailed information on
  * memory ordering guarantees.
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 8e78b2430c16..c32891763955 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3848,7 +3848,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(start_poll_synchronize_rcu);
  *
  * If a full RCU grace period has elapsed since the earlier call from
  * which oldstate was obtained, return @true, otherwise return @false.
- * If @false is returned, it is the caller's responsibilty to invoke this
+ * If @false is returned, it is the caller's responsibility to invoke this
  * function later on until it does return @true.  Alternatively, the caller
  * can explicitly wait for a grace period, for example, by passing @oldstate
  * to cond_synchronize_rcu() or by directly invoking synchronize_rcu().
@@ -4094,7 +4094,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier);
 /*
  * Propagate ->qsinitmask bits up the rcu_node tree to account for the
  * first CPU in a given leaf rcu_node structure coming online.  The caller
- * must hold the corresponding leaf rcu_node ->lock with interrrupts
+ * must hold the corresponding leaf rcu_node ->lock with interrupts
  * disabled.
  */
 static void rcu_init_new_rnp(struct rcu_node *rnp_leaf)
-- 
2.25.1





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux