On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 11:28:55PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 04:26:31PM -0800, paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > There is a need for a non-blocking polling interface for RCU grace > > periods, so this commit supplies start_poll_synchronize_rcu() and > > poll_state_synchronize_rcu() for this purpose. Note that the existing > > get_state_synchronize_rcu() may be used if future grace periods are > > inevitable (perhaps due to a later call_rcu() invocation). The new > > start_poll_synchronize_rcu() is to be used if future grace periods > > might not otherwise happen. Finally, poll_state_synchronize_rcu() > > provides a lockless check for a grace period having elapsed since > > the corresponding call to either of the get_state_synchronize_rcu() > > or start_poll_synchronize_rcu(). > > > > As with get_state_synchronize_rcu(), the return value from either > > get_state_synchronize_rcu() or start_poll_synchronize_rcu() is passed in > > to a later call to either poll_state_synchronize_rcu() or the existing > > (might_sleep) cond_synchronize_rcu(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > include/linux/rcutiny.h | 11 ++++++----- > > kernel/rcu/tiny.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/rcutiny.h b/include/linux/rcutiny.h > > index 2a97334..69108cf4 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/rcutiny.h > > +++ b/include/linux/rcutiny.h > > @@ -17,14 +17,15 @@ > > /* Never flag non-existent other CPUs! */ > > static inline bool rcu_eqs_special_set(int cpu) { return false; } > > > > -static inline unsigned long get_state_synchronize_rcu(void) > > -{ > > - return 0; > > -} > > +unsigned long get_state_synchronize_rcu(void); > > +unsigned long start_poll_synchronize_rcu(void); > > +bool poll_state_synchronize_rcu(unsigned long oldstate); > > > > static inline void cond_synchronize_rcu(unsigned long oldstate) > > { > > - might_sleep(); > > + if (poll_state_synchronize_rcu(oldstate)) > > + return; > > + synchronize_rcu(); > > Perhaps cond_synchronize_rcu() could stay as it was. If it might > call synchronize_rcu() then it inherits its constraint to be > called from a quiescent state. As in leave the might_sleep()? How about something like this? static inline void cond_synchronize_rcu(unsigned long oldstate) { if (!poll_state_synchronize_rcu(oldstate)) synchronize_rcu(); else might_sleep(); } One advantage of this is that the Tiny and Tree implementations become identical and can then be consolidated. Or did I miss your point? Thanx, Paul