From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx>
After commit 5130b8fd0690 ("rcu: Introduce kfree_rcu() single-argument macro"),
kernel-doc now emits two warnings:
./include/linux/rcupdate.h:884: warning: Excess function parameter 'ptr' description in 'kfree_rcu'
./include/linux/rcupdate.h:884: warning: Excess function parameter 'rhf' description in 'kfree_rcu'
This commit added some macro magic in order to call two different versions
of kfree_rcu(), the first having just one argument and the second having
two arguments. That makes it difficult to document the kfree_rcu() arguments
in the docboook header.
In order to make clearer that this macro accepts optional arguments,
this commit uses macro concatenation so that this macro changes from:
#define kfree_rcu kvfree_rcu
to:
#define kfree_rcu(ptr, rhf...) kvfree_rcu(ptr, ## rhf)
That not only helps kernel-doc understand the macro arguments, but also
provides a better C definition that makes clearer that the first argument
is mandatory and the second one is optional.
Fixes: 5130b8fd0690 ("rcu: Introduce kfree_rcu() single-argument macro")
Tested-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index bd04f72..5cc6dea 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ static inline notrace void rcu_read_unlock_sched_notrace(void)
* The BUILD_BUG_ON check must not involve any function calls, hence the
* checks are done in macros here.
*/
-#define kfree_rcu kvfree_rcu
+#define kfree_rcu(ptr, rhf...) kvfree_rcu(ptr, ## rhf)
/**
* kvfree_rcu() - kvfree an object after a grace period.
--
2.9.5
