From: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The condition in the trace_rcu_grace_period() in rcutree_dying_cpu() is
backwards, so that it uses the string "cpuofl" when the offline CPU is
blocking the current grace period and "cpuofl-bgp" otherwise. Given that
the "-bgp" stands for "blocking grace period", this is at best misleading.
This commit therefore switches these strings in order to correctly trace
whether the outgoing cpu blocks the current grace period.
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index cdf091f..e62c2de 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2413,7 +2413,7 @@ int rcutree_dying_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
blkd = !!(rnp->qsmask & rdp->grpmask);
trace_rcu_grace_period(rcu_state.name, READ_ONCE(rnp->gp_seq),
- blkd ? TPS("cpuofl") : TPS("cpuofl-bgp"));
+ blkd ? TPS("cpuofl-bgp") : TPS("cpuofl"));
return 0;
}
--
2.9.5
