Re: [PATCH 0/5] A few smaller RCU related patches from the RT tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 03:16:44PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I know the timming of this regarding the merge window is bad. I meant to
> send them for days…

Not a problem!

However, unless any of these are urgent, I plan to submit them not into
this merge window, but rather into the v5.12 merge window.  (I don't
see any of them being urgent, but I could well be missing something.)

> Initially I planned to send only 5/5 of the series but then I stumbled
> upon the other RCU related patches and I don't see a reason I shouldn't
> post them.
> I still have one patch regarding rcutorture which I hold on to until the
> current issues are resolved (in case you are curious: Scott made sure BH
> can disabled properly in atomic context on RT (while keeping this
> limitation to RT only builds). The current softirq implementation does
> not allow to disable BH in atomic context).

Queued and pushed, thank you all!  Nice automation of PREEMPT_RT
configuration.

I have done my usual wordsmithing, so if any of you see anything I messed
up, please don't keep it a secret.

I also updated #2 and #3 to change kernel-parameters.txt accordingly.

							Thanx, Paul



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux