On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:43:41 +0100 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 9:21 AM SeongJae Park <sjpark@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: SeongJae Park <sjpark@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > For each 'fqdir_exit()' call, a work for destroy of the 'fqdir' is
> > enqueued. The work function, 'fqdir_work_fn()', internally calls
> > 'rcu_barrier()'. In case of intensive 'fqdir_exit()' (e.g., frequent
> > 'unshare()' systemcalls), this increased contention could result in
> > unacceptably high latency of 'rcu_barrier()'. This commit avoids such
> > contention by doing the 'rcu_barrier()' and subsequent lightweight works
> > in a batched manner using a dedicated singlethread worker, as similar to
> > that of 'cleanup_net()'.
>
>
> Not sure why you submit a patch series with a single patch.
>
> Your cover letter contains interesting info that would better be
> captured in this changelog IMO
I thought someone might think this is not a kernel issue but the reproducer is
insane or 'rcu_barrier()' needs modification. I wanted to do such discussion
on the coverletter. Seems I misjudged. I will make this single patch and move
the detailed information here from the next version.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sjpark@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > include/net/inet_frag.h | 1 +
> > net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/net/inet_frag.h b/include/net/inet_frag.h
> > index bac79e817776..48cc5795ceda 100644
> > --- a/include/net/inet_frag.h
> > +++ b/include/net/inet_frag.h
> > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ struct fqdir {
> > /* Keep atomic mem on separate cachelines in structs that include it */
> > atomic_long_t mem ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
> > struct work_struct destroy_work;
> > + struct llist_node free_list;
> > };
> >
> > /**
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c b/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
> > index 10d31733297d..a6fc4afcc323 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
> > @@ -145,12 +145,17 @@ static void inet_frags_free_cb(void *ptr, void *arg)
> > inet_frag_destroy(fq);
> > }
> >
> > -static void fqdir_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
> > +static struct workqueue_struct *fqdir_wq;
> > +static LLIST_HEAD(free_list);
> > +
> > +static void fqdir_free_fn(struct work_struct *work)
> > {
> > - struct fqdir *fqdir = container_of(work, struct fqdir, destroy_work);
> > - struct inet_frags *f = fqdir->f;
> > + struct llist_node *kill_list;
> > + struct fqdir *fqdir, *tmp;
> > + struct inet_frags *f;
> >
> > - rhashtable_free_and_destroy(&fqdir->rhashtable, inet_frags_free_cb, NULL);
> > + /* Atomically snapshot the list of fqdirs to free */
> > + kill_list = llist_del_all(&free_list);
> >
> > /* We need to make sure all ongoing call_rcu(..., inet_frag_destroy_rcu)
> > * have completed, since they need to dereference fqdir.
> > @@ -158,12 +163,38 @@ static void fqdir_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
> > */
> > rcu_barrier();
> >
> > - if (refcount_dec_and_test(&f->refcnt))
> > - complete(&f->completion);
> > + llist_for_each_entry_safe(fqdir, tmp, kill_list, free_list) {
> > + f = fqdir->f;
> > + if (refcount_dec_and_test(&f->refcnt))
> > + complete(&f->completion);
> >
> > - kfree(fqdir);
> > + kfree(fqdir);
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > +static DECLARE_WORK(fqdir_free_work, fqdir_free_fn);
> > +
> > +static void fqdir_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
> > +{
> > + struct fqdir *fqdir = container_of(work, struct fqdir, destroy_work);
> > +
> > + rhashtable_free_and_destroy(&fqdir->rhashtable, inet_frags_free_cb, NULL);
> > +
> > + if (llist_add(&fqdir->free_list, &free_list))
> > + queue_work(fqdir_wq, &fqdir_free_work);
>
> I think you misunderstood me.
>
> Since this fqdir_free_work will have at most one instance, you can use
> system_wq here, there is no risk of abuse.
>
> My suggestion was to not use system_wq for fqdir_exit(), to better
> control the number
> of threads in rhashtable cleanups.
>
> void fqdir_exit(struct fqdir *fqdir)
> {
> INIT_WORK(&fqdir->destroy_work, fqdir_work_fn);
> - queue_work(system_wq, &fqdir->destroy_work);
> + queue_work(fqdir_wq, &fqdir->destroy_work);
> }
Oh, got it. I definitely misunderstood. My fault, sorry.
>
>
>
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int __init fqdir_wq_init(void)
> > +{
> > + fqdir_wq = create_singlethread_workqueue("fqdir");
>
>
> And here, I suggest to use a non ordered work queue, allowing one
> thread per cpu, to allow concurrent rhashtable cleanups
>
> Also "fqdir" name is rather vague, this is an implementation detail ?
>
> fqdir_wq =create_workqueue("inet_frag_wq");
So, what you are suggesting is to use a dedicated non-ordered work queue
(fqdir_wq) for rhashtable cleanup and do the remaining works with system_wq in
the batched manner, right? IOW, doing below change on top of this patch.
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static void inet_frags_free_cb(void *ptr, void *arg)
inet_frag_destroy(fq);
}
-static struct workqueue_struct *fqdir_wq;
+static struct workqueue_struct *inet_frag_wq;
static LLIST_HEAD(free_list);
static void fqdir_free_fn(struct work_struct *work)
@@ -181,14 +181,14 @@ static void fqdir_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
rhashtable_free_and_destroy(&fqdir->rhashtable, inet_frags_free_cb, NULL);
if (llist_add(&fqdir->free_list, &free_list))
- queue_work(fqdir_wq, &fqdir_free_work);
+ queue_work(system_wq, &fqdir_free_work);
}
static int __init fqdir_wq_init(void)
{
- fqdir_wq = create_singlethread_workqueue("fqdir");
- if (!fqdir_wq)
- panic("Could not create fqdir workq");
+ inet_frag_wq = create_workqueue("inet_frag_wq");
+ if (!inet_frag_wq)
+ panic("Could not create inet frag workq");
return 0;
}
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(fqdir_init);
void fqdir_exit(struct fqdir *fqdir)
{
INIT_WORK(&fqdir->destroy_work, fqdir_work_fn);
- queue_work(system_wq, &fqdir->destroy_work);
+ queue_work(inet_frag_wq, &fqdir->destroy_work);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(fqdir_exit);
If I'm still misunderstanding, please let me know.
Thanks,
SeongJae Park
