Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/4] docs: Update RCU's hotplug requirements with a bit about design

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 08:24:52AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 01:23:17PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 03:05:08PM -0800, paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > The rcu_barrier() section of the "Hotplug CPU" section discusses
> > > deadlocks, however the description of deadlocks other than those involving
> > > rcu_barrier() is rather incomplete.
> > > 
> > > This commit therefore continues the section by describing how RCU's
> > > design handles CPU hotplug in a deadlock-free way.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  .../RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst       | 49 +++++++++++++++++-----
> > >  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst
> > > index 1ae79a1..98557fe 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst
> > > +++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst
> > > @@ -1929,16 +1929,45 @@ The Linux-kernel CPU-hotplug implementation has notifiers that are used
> > >  to allow the various kernel subsystems (including RCU) to respond
> > >  appropriately to a given CPU-hotplug operation. Most RCU operations may
> > >  be invoked from CPU-hotplug notifiers, including even synchronous
> > > -grace-period operations such as ``synchronize_rcu()`` and
> > > -``synchronize_rcu_expedited()``.
> > 
> > I was under the impression that this rst crap now recognises func() and
> > you no longer need to make the text unreadable with "``".
> 
> It was there to start with, but good point.  How about the commit
> below?

Much appreciated, thanks!



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux