On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 10:15:22AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:12:16 -0400 > Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Fixes: 4ecf0a43e729 ("processor: get rid of cpu_relax_yield") > > > Fixes: 366237e7b083 ("stop_machine: Provide RCU quiescent state in > > > multi_cpu_stop()") > > > > I really do not like to add "notrace" to core functions because a single > > architecture has issues with it. Why does RISCV have problems with these > > functions but no other architecture does? > > > > NACK from me until it is shown that these are issues for a broader set of > > architectures. > > After looking at the two above fixes, I take back my NACK ;-) > > One of them duplicates an already notraced function, so that looks fine. > The other makes a static function global, which could cause issues as well. > > After further review: > > Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> If someone else would like to take this: Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> Or let me know if you would like me to take it, target v5.11. Thanx, Paul