On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 03:53:03AM +0000, Zhouyi Zhou wrote: > There is a tiny typo in comment of function rcu_blocking_is_gp. > > Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@xxxxxxxxx> Good catch, queued, thank you! Thanx, Paul > --- > kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c > index f78ee75..4cca03f 100644 > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c > @@ -3512,7 +3512,7 @@ void __init kfree_rcu_scheduler_running(void) > * During early boot, any blocking grace-period wait automatically > * implies a grace period. Later on, this is never the case for PREEMPTION. > * > - * Howevr, because a context switch is a grace period for !PREEMPTION, any > + * However, because a context switch is a grace period for !PREEMPTION, any > * blocking grace-period wait automatically implies a grace period if > * there is only one CPU online at any point time during execution of > * either synchronize_rcu() or synchronize_rcu_expedited(). It is OK to > -- > 1.7.1 >
