Hi Paul,
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 09:16:29AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 06:22:49PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 08:02:22AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 06:04:05AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > Commit 8344496e8b49 ("rcu-tasks: Conditionally compile
> > > > show_rcu_tasks_gp_kthreads()") introduced conditional compilation of
> > > > several functions, but forgot one occurrence of
> > > > show_rcu_tasks_classic_gp_kthread() that causes the compiler to warn of
> > > > an unused static function. Fix it.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 8344496e8b49 ("rcu-tasks: Conditionally compile show_rcu_tasks_gp_kthreads()")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 2 ++
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> > > > index 835e2df8590a..bddf3968c1eb 100644
> > > > --- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> > > > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> > > > @@ -590,7 +590,9 @@ void exit_tasks_rcu_finish(void) __releases(&tasks_rcu_exit_srcu)
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU */
> > > > +#ifndef CONFIG_TINY_RCU
> > > > static void show_rcu_tasks_classic_gp_kthread(void) { }
> > > > +#endif /* #ifndef CONFIG_TINY_RCU */
> > > > void exit_tasks_rcu_start(void) { }
> > > > void exit_tasks_rcu_finish(void) { exit_tasks_rcu_finish_trace(current); }
> > > > #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU */
> > >
> > > Good catch!!!
> > >
> > > But does the following addition of "static inline" work for you?
> >
> > They do. I initially added a static inline, and realized #ifdef was used
> > extensively when trying to find the proper Fixes: tag, so I went for
> > that. I don't mind either way, as long as this gets fixed :-)
>
> This is admittedly an odd .h file, given that it is included but once.
>
> I have applied the following patch with your Reported-by, cc-ing -stable
> for v5.8 and later.
I don't see the fix in Linus' master branch. Given that 8344496e8b49 was
introduced in v5.9-rc1, shouldn't this be treated as a regression and
merged before Linus releases v5.9 ?
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> > > index 835e2df..3dc3ffc 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> > > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> > > @@ -590,9 +590,9 @@ void exit_tasks_rcu_finish(void) __releases(&tasks_rcu_exit_srcu)
> > > }
> > >
> > > #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU */
> > > -static void show_rcu_tasks_classic_gp_kthread(void) { }
> > > -void exit_tasks_rcu_start(void) { }
> > > -void exit_tasks_rcu_finish(void) { exit_tasks_rcu_finish_trace(current); }
> > > +static inline void show_rcu_tasks_classic_gp_kthread(void) { }
> > > +static inline void exit_tasks_rcu_start(void) { }
> > > +static inline void exit_tasks_rcu_finish(void) { exit_tasks_rcu_finish_trace(current); }
> > > #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU */
> > >
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RUDE_RCU
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
