On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 05:27:51PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 21:15:56 +0300 nikolay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Ah, you want to solve it for all. :) > > Looks and sounds good to me, > > Reviewed-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Actually, I give up, lockdep_is_held() is not defined without > CONFIG_LOCKDEP, let's just go with your patch.. Care to send a patch just for the RCU macro then? Not sure what Dave is applying but if the net-next tree is not taking the RCU macro change, then send another one with my tag: Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> thanks! - Joel
