[PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/24] rcu/trace: Use gp_seq_req in acceleration's rcu_grace_period tracepoint

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

During acceleration of CB, the rsp's gp_seq is rcu_seq_snap'd. This is
the value used for acceleration - it is the value of gp_seq at which it
is safe the execute all callbacks in the callback list.

The rdp's gp_seq is not very useful for this scenario. Make
rcu_grace_period report the gp_seq_req instead as it allows one to
reason about how the acceleration works.

Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index eb36779..8969120 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -1483,9 +1483,10 @@ static bool rcu_accelerate_cbs(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
 
 	/* Trace depending on how much we were able to accelerate. */
 	if (rcu_segcblist_restempty(&rdp->cblist, RCU_WAIT_TAIL))
-		trace_rcu_grace_period(rcu_state.name, rdp->gp_seq, TPS("AccWaitCB"));
+		trace_rcu_grace_period(rcu_state.name, gp_seq_req, TPS("AccWaitCB"));
 	else
-		trace_rcu_grace_period(rcu_state.name, rdp->gp_seq, TPS("AccReadyCB"));
+		trace_rcu_grace_period(rcu_state.name, gp_seq_req, TPS("AccReadyCB"));
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
-- 
2.9.5





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux