On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 07:04:25PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 05:21:37PM -0700, paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The objtool complains about the call to rcu_cleanup_after_idle() from
> > rcu_nmi_enter(), so this commit adds instrumentation_begin() before that
> > call and instrumentation_end() after it.
>
> Hmm, I've not seen this one. Still,
I am still based off of v5.8-rc1, so I might be missing some commits.
Not seeing any that would affect this, but that doesn't mean that
there aren't any. ;-)
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I will apply this on my next rebase, thank you!
Thanx, Paul
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > kernel/rcu/tree.c | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > index 08e3648..67912ad 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > @@ -980,8 +980,11 @@ noinstr void rcu_nmi_enter(void)
> > rcu_dynticks_eqs_exit();
> > // ... but is watching here.
> >
> > - if (!in_nmi())
> > + if (!in_nmi()) {
> > + instrumentation_begin();
> > rcu_cleanup_after_idle();
> > + instrumentation_end();
> > + }
> >
> > incby = 1;
> > } else if (!in_nmi()) {
> > --
> > 2.9.5
> >
