On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 1:15 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 08:05:00AM -0400, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote: > > These patches clean up the usage of dynticks nesting counters simplifying the > > code, while preserving the usecases. > > > > It is a much needed simplification, makes the code less confusing, and prevents > > future bugs such as those that arise from forgetting that the > > dynticks_nmi_nesting counter is not a simple counter and can be "crowbarred" in > > common situations. > > > > rcutorture testing with all TREE RCU configurations succeed with > > CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG=y and CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y. > > > > v1->v2: > > - Rebase on v5.6-rc6 > > > > v2->v3: > > - Rebase on rcu/dev with adjustments for tasks-RCU. > > Thank you! > > But this does not apply to any of v5.6-rc6, v5.7-rc1, or v5.7-rc2. > > Where should I be trying to apply it? > Hi Paul, It is for the rcu/dev branch as mentioned in the cover letter subject line. I thought it would reduce conflicts for you if I rebased on that. There are conflicts with trace-RCU for example. What do you suggest? Thanks, - Joel
