On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 09:04:22PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 10:33:25AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Thanks Peter and Boqun, the below patch makes sense to me. Just had some nits > below, otherwise: > > @@ -1719,11 +1725,11 @@ unsigned long lockdep_count_forward_deps > > this.class = class; > > > > raw_local_irq_save(flags); > > - current->lockdep_recursion = 1; > > + current->lockdep_recursion++; > > arch_spin_lock(&lockdep_lock); > > ret = __lockdep_count_forward_deps(&this); > > arch_spin_unlock(&lockdep_lock); > > - current->lockdep_recursion = 0; > > + current->lockdep_recursion--; > > This doesn't look like it should recurse. Why not just use the > lockdep_recursion_finish() helper here? I chose to only add that to the sites that check recursion on entry.
