Hello, Joel. > > Hi Uladzislau, > > Your patch is based on an older version of the kfree_rcu work. The latest > version is in Paul's -dev branch. There is also additional work done in that > branch as well "rcu: Add multiple in-flight batches of kfree_rcu() work" : > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git/commit/?h=dev&id=e38fa01b94c87dfa945afa603ed50b4f7955934b > Ahh. I see there are some differences and my baseline is wrong. I will double check and rebase on Paul's -dev branch. > > Could you rebase your patch on Paul's -dev branch? The branch also has an > rcuperf patch for measuring memory footprint automatically (memory footprint > value is printed by rcuperf). Although I'd say try to use the latest version > of the rcuperf patch by reverting that and applying: > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1170895/ . I can then add your > Tested-by tag to any future postings of the patch for rcuperf as well! > I will do that and run all tests based on the latest code base. Thanks for your comments. -- Vlad Rezki
