On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 12:31:38PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > We might want to consider simply using xchg() here. As stated elsewhere, xchg() is an atomic op with full ordering, IOW it is stupid expensive for what needs to be done.
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 12:31:38PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > We might want to consider simply using xchg() here. As stated elsewhere, xchg() is an atomic op with full ordering, IOW it is stupid expensive for what needs to be done.
|