On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 14:17:40 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Certainly "up_rcu" seems like a better name. I do believe, though, that > > you can also use the title directly: > > > > See `RCU on Uniprocessor Systems`_ for more information > > That does look prettier, though we might want to do something more > directly mapped for people directly reading the .rst files. Yeah, the alternative there is to just say "Documentation/RCU/UP.rst". It's vaporware at the moment, but the plan is to recognize such strings and link them up automatically in the build process. It's easy enough to do, I just have to get around to it. In anticipation of that, just putting in the file name is probably the right thing to do. Thanks, jon
