On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 08:31:59 -0400 Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Oh thanks for pointing that out. Yes it does work for me. I agree with the > lockdep API addition and others could benefit from it too. I will incorporate > the lockdep API addition into the RCU patch, but let me know if I should > rather split it. I'd recommend splitting it (adding the lockdep_assert in a patch by itself), but make sure that patch Cc's the lockdep maintainers and explains the reason for adding it. Might as well Cc the lockdep maintainers on the entire series too. -- Steve