Re: [GIT PULL] md-6.15-20250312

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/12/25 8:24 PM, Yu Kuai wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> 
> Please consider pulling the following changes for md-6.15 on your
> for-6.15/block branch, this pull request contains:
> 
> - fix recovery can preempt resync (Li Nan)
> - fix md-bitmap IO limit (Su Yue)
> - fix raid10 discard with REQ_NOWAIT (Xiao Ni)
> - fix raid1 memory leak (Zheng Qixing)
> - fix mddev uaf (Yu Kuai)
> - fix raid1,raid10 IO flags (Yu Kuai)
> - some refactor and cleanup (Yu Kuai)
> 
> Thanks,
> Kuai
> 
> The following changes since commit a052bfa636bb763786b9dc13a301a59afb03787a:
> 
>   block: refactor rq_qos_wait() (2025-02-11 13:04:11 -0700)
> 
> are available in the Git repository at:
>   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mdraid/linux.git tags/md-6.15-20250312
> 
> for you to fetch changes up to 3db4404435397a345431b45f57876a3df133f3b4:
> 
>   md/raid10: wait barrier before returning discard request with REQ_NOWAIT (2025-03-06 22:34:20 +0800)
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Li Nan (1):
>       md: ensure resync is prioritized over recovery
> 
> Su Yue (1):
>       md/md-bitmap: fix wrong bitmap_limit for clustermd when write sb
> 
> Xiao Ni (1):
>       md/raid10: wait barrier before returning discard request with REQ_NOWAIT
> 
> Yu Kuai (10):
>       md: merge common code into find_pers()
>       md: only include md-cluster.h if necessary
>       md: introduce struct md_submodule_head and APIs
>       md: switch personalities to use md_submodule_head
>       md/md-cluster: cleanup md_cluster_ops reference
>       md: don't export md_cluster_ops
>       md: switch md-cluster to use md_submodle_head
>       md: fix mddev uaf while iterating all_mddevs list
>       md/raid5: merge reshape_progress checking inside get_reshape_loc()
>       md/raid1,raid10: don't ignore IO flags

Pulled, thanks - fwiw, I did not get any merge conflicts, neither pulling
it into my for-6.15/block, nor merging it into my for-next. But if
the potential conflict is with 7e5102dd99f3, then that's already in my
6.15 branch.

-- 
Jens Axboe





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux