On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 09:12:53AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote: > Hi, > > 在 2025/02/21 18:12, Coly Li 写道: > > So we don’t need to add a negative return value for partial success/failure? > > > > Coly Li. > > Yes, I think so. No one really use this value, and patch 10 clean this > up by changing return type to bool. OK, then it is fine to me. It will be good to add a code comment that parital setting will be treated as failure. Thanks. -- Coly Li
