Re: [PATCH 03/12] badblocks: attempt to merge adjacent badblocks during ack_all_badblocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



在 2025/02/21 16:11, Zheng Qixing 写道:
From: Li Nan <linan122@xxxxxxxxxx>

If ack and unack badblocks are adjacent, they will not be merged and will
remain as two separate badblocks. Even after the bad blocks are written
to disk and both become ack, they will still remain as two independent
bad blocks. This is not ideal as it wastes the limited space for
badblocks. Therefore, during ack_all_badblocks(), attempt to merge
badblocks if they are adjacent.

Fixes: aa511ff8218b ("badblocks: switch to the improved badblock handling code")
Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan122@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  block/badblocks.c | 5 +++++
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

LGTM
Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/block/badblocks.c b/block/badblocks.c
index f069c93e986d..ad8652fbe1c8 100644
--- a/block/badblocks.c
+++ b/block/badblocks.c
@@ -1491,6 +1491,11 @@ void ack_all_badblocks(struct badblocks *bb)
  				p[i] = BB_MAKE(start, len, 1);
  			}
  		}
+
+		for (i = 0; i < bb->count ; i++)
+			while (try_adjacent_combine(bb, i))
+				;
+
  		bb->unacked_exist = 0;
  	}
  	write_sequnlock_irq(&bb->lock);






[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux