> Just curious, what you guys do for filesystems like ext4/xfs, and > they just define the same structure in user-space tools. > > looks like your tool do support to create ext4 images, and it's using > ext4's use-space tools directly. If it's true, do you consider to use > mdadm directly? > > Thanks, > Kuai Yes, we do use external tools when possible. It is not possible with mdadm. Mdadm cannot create disk image of MD RAID array. Kernel does this. We want/need purely userspace generator, so we don't have to care about permissions, losetup, kernel-side mdraid runtime, etc... We just want to generate valid image without involving kernel in any way. I was using mdadm before switching to genimage and it adds complexity of handling all the edge cases of kernel states. Mkfs.ext4 can create image without involving kernel, mdadm cannot, it always instructs kernel to create the metadata for it when creating array. In my opinion we should decide whether it makes sense for kernel to export the structures in header file and either provide all of them, or provide none. That might be valid reasoning to say every userspace program should include its own definitions of structures. But providing half does not make any sense. I wonder if mdadm needs some of definitions that i have omitted from UAPI. Tom
