Hi,
在 2024/09/02 16:55, Mariusz Tkaczyk 写道:
On Sat, 31 Aug 2024 09:14:39 +0800
Yu Kuai <yukuai1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
在 2024/08/30 18:28, Mariusz Tkaczyk 写道:
On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 15:27:17 +0800
Yu Kuai <yukuai1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Faulty will be checked before issuing IO to the rdev, however, rdev can
be faulty at any time, hence it's possible that rdev_set_badblocks()
will be called for faulty rdev. In this case, mddev->sb_flags will be
set and some other path can be blocked by updating super block.
Since faulty rdev will not be accesed anymore, there is no need to
record new babblocks for faulty rdev and forcing updating super block.
Noted this is not a bugfix, just prevent updating superblock in some
corner cases, and will help to slice a bug related to external
metadata[1].
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/f34452df-810b-48b2-a9b4-7f925699a9e7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/md/md.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index 675d89597c7b..a3f7f407fe42 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -9757,6 +9757,10 @@ int rdev_set_badblocks(struct md_rdev *rdev,
sector_t s, int sectors, {
struct mddev *mddev = rdev->mddev;
int rv;
+
+ if (test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags))
+ return 1;
+
Blame is volatile, this is why we need a comment here :)
Otherwise, someone may remove that.
Perhaps something like following?
/*
* record new babblocks for faulty rdev will force unnecessary
* super block updating.
*/
Almost, we need to refer to external context because this is important to
mention where to expect issues:
/*
* Recording new badblocks for faulty rdev will force unnecessary
* super block updating. This is fragile for external management because
* userspace daemon may trying to remove this device and deadlock may
* occur. This will be probably solved in the mdadm, but it is safer to avoid
* it.
*/
In my testing, I observed that it improves failing bios and device removal
path (recording badblock is simply expensive if there are many badblocks) so
the devices are removed faster but I don't have data here, this is what I saw.
I'll mention this in the commit message, and add the above comment in
v2.
Thanks,
Kuai
Obviously, it is optimization.
Mariusz
.
