Re: [PATCH RFC -next 03/26] md/md-bitmap: merge md_bitmap_load() into bitmap_operations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

在 2024/08/13 15:07, Mariusz Tkaczyk 写道:
On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 10:08:31 +0800
Yu Kuai <yukuai1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>

So that the implementation won't be exposed, and it'll be possible
to invent a new bitmap by replacing bitmap_operations.

I don't like repeating same commit message for few patches.


Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/md/md-bitmap.c |  6 +++---
  drivers/md/md-bitmap.h | 10 +++++++++-
  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c b/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c
index d731f7d4bbbb..9a9f0fe3ebd0 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c
@@ -1965,7 +1965,7 @@ static struct bitmap *bitmap_create(struct mddev
*mddev, int slot) return ERR_PTR(err);
  }
-int md_bitmap_load(struct mddev *mddev)
+static int bitmap_load(struct mddev *mddev)
  {
  	int err = 0;
  	sector_t start = 0;
@@ -2021,7 +2021,6 @@ int md_bitmap_load(struct mddev *mddev)
  out:
  	return err;
  }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(md_bitmap_load);
/* caller need to free returned bitmap with md_bitmap_free() */
  struct bitmap *get_bitmap_from_slot(struct mddev *mddev, int slot)
@@ -2411,7 +2410,7 @@ location_store(struct mddev *mddev, const char *buf,
size_t len) }
mddev->bitmap = bitmap;
-			rv = md_bitmap_load(mddev);
+			rv = bitmap_load(mddev);
  			if (rv) {
  				mddev->bitmap_info.offset = 0;
  				md_bitmap_destroy(mddev);
@@ -2710,6 +2709,7 @@ const struct attribute_group md_bitmap_group = {
static struct bitmap_operations bitmap_ops = {
  	.create			= bitmap_create,
+	.load			= bitmap_load,
  };
void mddev_set_bitmap_ops(struct mddev *mddev)
diff --git a/drivers/md/md-bitmap.h b/drivers/md/md-bitmap.h
index a7cbf0c692fc..de7fbe5903dd 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md-bitmap.h
+++ b/drivers/md/md-bitmap.h
@@ -236,6 +236,7 @@ struct bitmap {
struct bitmap_operations {
  	struct bitmap* (*create)(struct mddev *mddev, int slot);
+	int (*load)(struct mddev *mddev);
  };
/* the bitmap API */
@@ -250,7 +251,14 @@ static inline struct bitmap *md_bitmap_create(struct
mddev *mddev, int slot) return mddev->bitmap_ops->create(mddev, slot);
  }
-int md_bitmap_load(struct mddev *mddev);
+static inline int md_bitmap_load(struct mddev *mddev)
+{
+	if (!mddev->bitmap_ops->load)
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	return mddev->bitmap_ops->load(mddev);
+}

At this point we have only on bitmpa op (at that probably won't change), so if
we we have bitmap_ops assigned (mddev->bitmap_ops != NULL) then ->load is must
have, hence I don't see a need for this wrapper.

Yes, we must define the load op otherwise the bitmap_ops is meaningless.


you probably made this to avoid changes across code. If yes, please mention it
in commit message but I still would prefer to replace them all by calls to
mddev->bitmap_ops->load().

I'll replace to use mddev->bitmap_ops->load() directly, and other
places. And I'll keep this inline helper for some ops that is used for
md-cluster, because I'm not planning to support md-cluster for the new
bitmap first.

Thanks,
Kuai


Mariusz


.






[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux