Re: General Protection Fault in md raid10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Colgate Minuette <rabbit@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: General Protection Fault in md raid10
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:52:28 +0800
Cc: "yangerkun@xxxxxxxxxx" <yangerkun@xxxxxxxxxx>, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <12425339.O9o76ZdvQC@sparkler>
References: <8365123.T7Z3S40VBb@sparkler> <90f685e1-9c55-d9c5-79d4-9ef354b3b703@huawei.com> <2932875.e9J7NaK4W3@sparkler> <12425339.O9o76ZdvQC@sparkler>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0

Hi!

在 2024/04/29 15:06, Colgate Minuette 写道:

Following up, the raid10 with the Samsung drives builds and starts syncing
correctly on 4.19.307, 5.10.211, and 5.15.154, but does not work on 6.1.85 or
newer.


That's good news, perhaps can you bisect between 5.15 and 6.1?

Thanks,
Kuai

References:
- General Protection Fault in md raid10
  - From: Colgate Minuette
- Re: General Protection Fault in md raid10
  - From: Yu Kuai
- Re: General Protection Fault in md raid10
  - From: Colgate Minuette
- Re: General Protection Fault in md raid10
  - From: Colgate Minuette

Prev by Date: Re: General Protection Fault in md raid10
Next by Date: [PATCH 1/8] mdadm: pass struct context for external reshapes
Previous by thread: Re: General Protection Fault in md raid10
Next by thread: [PATCH 1/8] mdadm: pass struct context for external reshapes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID Wiki] [ATA RAID] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Linux Block] [Linux IDE] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams] [Device Mapper] [Device Mapper Cryptographics] [Kernel] [Linux Admin] [Linux Net] [GFS] [RPM] [git] [Yosemite Forum]

Powered by Linux