Re: [REGRESSION] 6.7.1: md: raid5 hang and unresponsive system; successfully bisected

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Dan,

Thanks for the report.

Can you define the hung? No hung task or other error from dmesg, any process in D status and what is the call trace if there is? From the perf result, looks like the raid thread is doing some real job, it may be issuing io since ops_run_io() took around 20% cpu, please share "iostat -xz 1" while the workload is running, i am wondering is this some performance issue with the workload?

Thanks,

Junxiao.

On 1/24/24 4:01 PM, Song Liu wrote:
Thanks for the information!


On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 3:58 PM Dan Moulding <dan@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
This appears the md thread hit some infinite loop, so I would like to
know what it is doing. We can probably get the information with the
perf tool, something like:

perf record -a
perf report
Here you go!

# Total Lost Samples: 0
#
# Samples: 78K of event 'cycles'
# Event count (approx.): 83127675745
#
# Overhead  Command          Shared Object                   Symbol
# ........  ...............  ..............................  ...................................................
#
     49.31%  md0_raid5        [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] handle_stripe
     18.63%  md0_raid5        [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] ops_run_io
      6.07%  md0_raid5        [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] handle_active_stripes.isra.0
      5.50%  md0_raid5        [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] do_release_stripe
      3.09%  md0_raid5        [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
      2.48%  md0_raid5        [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] r5l_write_stripe
      1.89%  md0_raid5        [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] md_wakeup_thread
      1.45%  ksmd             [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] ksm_scan_thread
      1.37%  md0_raid5        [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] stripe_is_lowprio
      0.87%  ksmd             [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] memcmp
      0.68%  ksmd             [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] xxh64
      0.56%  md0_raid5        [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] __wake_up_common
      0.52%  md0_raid5        [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] __wake_up
      0.46%  ksmd             [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] mtree_load
      0.44%  ksmd             [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] try_grab_page
      0.40%  ksmd             [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] follow_p4d_mask.constprop.0
      0.39%  md0_raid5        [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] r5l_log_disk_error
      0.37%  md0_raid5        [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] _raw_spin_lock_irq
      0.33%  md0_raid5        [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] release_stripe_list
      0.31%  md0_raid5        [kernel.kallsyms]               [k] release_inactive_stripe_list
It appears the thread is indeed doing something. I haven't got luck to
reproduce this on my hosts. Could you please try whether the following
change fixes the issue (without reverting 0de40f76d567)? I will try to
reproduce the issue on my side.

Junxiao,

Please also help look into this.

Thanks,
Song




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux