Re: problem with recovered array

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Roger Heflin (rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx) wrote on Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 01:14:49PM -03:
> look at  SAR -d output for all the disks in the raid6.   It may be a
> disk issue (though I suspect not given the 100% cpu show in raid).
> 
> Clearly something very expensive/deadlockish is happening because of
> the raid having to rebuild the data from the missing disk, not sure
> what could be wrong with it.

This is very similar to what I complained some 3 months ago. For me it happens
with an array in normal state. sar shows no disk activity yet there are no
writes to the array (reads happen normally) and the flushd thread uses 100%
cpu.

For the latest 6.5.* I can reliably reproduce it with
% xzcat linux-6.5.tar.xz | tar x -f -

This leaves the machine with ~1.5GB of dirty pages (as reported by
/proc/meminfo) that it never manages to write to the array. I've waited for
several hours to no avail. After a reboot the kernel tree had only about 220MB
instead of ~1.5GB...



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux