Re: [PATCH -next v3 6/7] md: factor out a helper rdev_addable() from remove_and_add_spares()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

在 2023/08/23 19:25, Song Liu 写道:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 1:37 AM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[...]
diff --git i/drivers/md/md.c w/drivers/md/md.c
index 78be7811a89f..8cb855d03e0a 100644
--- i/drivers/md/md.c
+++ w/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -9117,6 +9117,20 @@ void md_do_sync(struct md_thread *thread)
   }
   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(md_do_sync);

+static bool rdev_addable(struct md_rdev *rdev)
+{
+       if (test_bit(Candidate, &rdev->flags) || rdev->raid_disk >= 0 ||
+           test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags))
+               return false;
+       return true;
+}
+
+static bool rdev_is_readd(struct md_rdev *rdev)
+{
+       return rdev->saved_raid_disk >= 0 ||
+               !test_bit(Bitmap_sync, &rdev->flags);
This should use '&&' instead of '||' ?

+}
+
   static int remove_and_add_spares(struct mddev *mddev,
                                   struct md_rdev *this)
   {
@@ -9176,25 +9190,24 @@ static int remove_and_add_spares(struct mddev *mddev,
          rdev_for_each(rdev, mddev) {
                  if (this && this != rdev)
                          continue;
-               if (test_bit(Candidate, &rdev->flags))
-                       continue;
                  if (rdev->raid_disk >= 0 &&
                      !test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags) &&
                      !test_bit(Journal, &rdev->flags) &&
                      !test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags))
                          spares++;
-               if (rdev->raid_disk >= 0)
+
+               if (!rdev_addable(rdev))
                          continue;
-               if (test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags))
+
+               if (test_bit(Journal, &rdev->flags))
+                       goto hot_add_disk;
+

I understand what you mean now, but I must use the exact same judgement
in the new helper md_spares_need_change() in patch 7, there will be
redundant code this way.

How about this, rework rdev_addable():

Yeah, this was another option that I was thinking about. Let's go with
this version.

Ok, and I'll do this for rdev_removeable() in patch 4 as well.

Thanks,
Kuai

Thanks,
Song


    static bool rdev_addable(struct md_rdev *rdev)
    {
+         /* rdev is already used, don't add it again. */
            if (test_bit(Candidate, &rdev->flags) || rdev->raid_disk >= 0 ||
                test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags))
                    return false;

~         /* Allow to add journal disk. */
~         if (test_bit(Journal, &rdev->flags))
~_                return true;

~         /* Allow to add if array is read-write. */
+         if (md_is_rdwr(rdev->mddev))
+                 return true;
+
+         /*
+          * For read-only array, only allow to readd a rdev. And if
bitmap is
+          * used, don't allow to readd a rdev that is too old.
+          */
+         if (rdev->saved_raid_disk >=0 && !test_bit(Bitmap_sync,
&rdev->flags))
+                 return true;
+
+         return false;
    }
.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux