On 8/21/23 10:16, Mariusz Tkaczyk wrote: > Hello, > IMSM/VROC is going to support self-encrypted drives. With this feature you need > to unlock the drives during boot-up in UEFI first. It is kind of protection > from physical stealing. > > To ensure security, Linux have to respect that. It means that we need to > determine if the drive support locking and do not allow to mix locked and > unlocked drives in one IMSM array. > > To grab that information we will need to impose the "magic commands" to the > drives. There is a libsed library, designed for such purposes: > https://github.com/sedcli/sedcli > > So far I know, this library is not released under distributions (not handled by > package managers) and that will bring not user friendly dependency- you will > need to compile and install the lib first to build mdadm. > > The sedcli project is maintained in Intel, currently it is not in active > development but there are no plans to drop it, interest around it is growing as > you can see. It seems to be great opportunity for this project to > become integrated with mainstream distributions when mdadm will start to > require it. > > So, my questions are: Are we fine with adding this dependency? Are there big > cons you see? > Obviously, I will make it optional like libudev is. > > I can try to re-implement the functionality I need in mdadm but it is like > reinventing the wheel. > > Any feedback will be appreciated. Hi Mariusz, I am not against adding it to mdadm, though I think a better approach is to try and get the library built as a package for the distros. Did you look into that yet? Thanks, Jes