On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 5:08 AM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> 在 2023/07/29 18:49, Song Liu 写道:
> > On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 10:12 AM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> 在 2023/07/22 15:53, Zhang Shurong 写道:
> >>> If rddev->raid_disk is greater than mddev->raid_disks, there will be
> >>> an out-of-bounds in raid1_remove_disk(). We have already found
> >>> similar reports as follows:
> >>>
> >>> 1) commit d17f744e883b ("md-raid10: fix KASAN warning")
> >>> 2) commit 1ebc2cec0b7d ("dm raid: fix KASAN warning in raid5_remove_disk")
> >>>
> >>> Fix this bug by checking whether the "number" variable is
> >>> valid.
> >>
> >> LGTM
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Shurong <zhang_shurong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>> Changes in v2:
> >>> - Using conf->raid_disks instead of mddev->raid_disks.
> >>>
> >>> drivers/md/raid1.c | 4 ++++
> >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> >>> index dd25832eb045..80aeee63dfb7 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> >>> @@ -1829,6 +1829,10 @@ static int raid1_remove_disk(struct mddev *mddev, struct md_rdev *rdev)
> >>> struct r1conf *conf = mddev->private;
> >>> int err = 0;
> >>> int number = rdev->raid_disk;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (unlikely(number >= conf->raid_disks))
> >>> + goto abort;
> >
> > We need err = -EINVAL here.
>
> I think return 0 is right here, so that caller can remove this rdev
> from array successfully, this only need to return error for the case
> -EBUSY.
Ah, that's right. Applied to md-next.
Thanks,
Song
