Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] badblocks improvement for multiple bad block ranges

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Coly Li <colyli@xxxxxxx>, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] badblocks improvement for multiple bad block ranges
From: Li Nan <linan666@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 10:38:41 +0800
Cc: nvdimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>, Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@xxxxxxxx>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>, Richard Fan <richard.fan@xxxxxxxx>, Vishal L Verma <vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx>, Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20220721121152.4180-1-colyli@suse.de>
References: <20220721121152.4180-1-colyli@suse.de>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0

Hi Coly Li,

Recently, I have been trying to fix the bug of backblocks settings, andI found that your patch series has already fixed the bug. This patchseries has not been applied to mainline at present, may I ask if youstill plan to continue working on it?


--
Thanks,
Nan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] badblocks improvement for multiple bad block ranges
  - From: Coly Li

References:
- [PATCH v6 0/7] badblocks improvement for multiple bad block ranges
  - From: Coly Li

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] md: fix duplicate filename for rdev
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] badblocks improvement for multiple bad block ranges
Previous by thread: [PATCH v6 7/7] test: user space code to test badblocks APIs
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] badblocks improvement for multiple bad block ranges
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID Wiki] [ATA RAID] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Linux Block] [Linux IDE] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams] [Device Mapper] [Device Mapper Cryptographics] [Kernel] [Linux Admin] [Linux Net] [GFS] [RPM] [git] [Yosemite Forum]