Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] md/raid10: fix wrong setting of max_corr_read_errors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

在 2023/05/13 9:08, Song Liu 写道:
On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 7:02 PM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

在 2023/05/06 9:23, linan666@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 写道:
From: Li Nan <linan122@xxxxxxxxxx>

max_corr_read_errors should not be negative number. Change it to
unsigned int where use it.


Looks good, feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>

Fixes: 1e50915fe0bb ("raid: improve MD/raid10 handling of correctable read errors.")
Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan122@xxxxxxxxxx>

Hmm.. Does the current code break in any cases?

The problem is that somewhere use unsigned value, and somewhere use
signed value, and I thinsk the only functional change is in
fix_read_error(), if max_read_errors is negative, the judgement will
always pass before this patch:

if (atomic_read(&rdev->read_errors) > max_read_errors)

Thanks,
Kuai

Thanks,
Song

---
   drivers/md/md.c     | 2 +-
   drivers/md/raid10.c | 5 +++--
   2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index fd5c3babcd6d..4a1e566d6bdc 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -4486,7 +4486,7 @@ __ATTR_PREALLOC(array_state, S_IRUGO|S_IWUSR, array_state_show, array_state_stor

   static ssize_t
   max_corrected_read_errors_show(struct mddev *mddev, char *page) {
-     return sprintf(page, "%d\n",
+     return sprintf(page, "%u\n",
                      atomic_read(&mddev->max_corr_read_errors));
   }

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
index 4fcfcb350d2b..4d615fcc6a50 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -2727,7 +2727,8 @@ static void fix_read_error(struct r10conf *conf, struct mddev *mddev, struct r10
       int sect = 0; /* Offset from r10_bio->sector */
       int sectors = r10_bio->sectors;
       struct md_rdev *rdev;
-     int max_read_errors = atomic_read(&mddev->max_corr_read_errors);
+     unsigned int max_read_errors =
+                     atomic_read(&mddev->max_corr_read_errors);
       int d = r10_bio->devs[r10_bio->read_slot].devnum;

       /* still own a reference to this rdev, so it cannot
@@ -2743,7 +2744,7 @@ static void fix_read_error(struct r10conf *conf, struct mddev *mddev, struct r10
       check_decay_read_errors(mddev, rdev);
       atomic_inc(&rdev->read_errors);
       if (atomic_read(&rdev->read_errors) > max_read_errors) {
-             pr_notice("md/raid10:%s: %pg: Raid device exceeded read_error threshold [cur %d:max %d]\n",
+             pr_notice("md/raid10:%s: %pg: Raid device exceeded read_error threshold [cur %u:max %u]\n",
                         mdname(mddev), rdev->bdev,
                         atomic_read(&rdev->read_errors), max_read_errors);
               pr_notice("md/raid10:%s: %pg: Failing raid device\n",


.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux