On 3/22/23 14:41, Yu Kuai wrote:
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx> This reverts commit 9dfbdafda3b34e262e43e786077bab8e476a89d1. Because it will introduce a defect that sync_thread can be running while MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING is cleared, which will cause some unexpected problems, for example: list_add corruption. prev->next should be next (ffff0001ac1daba0), but was ffff0000ce1a02a0. (prev=ffff0000ce1a02a0). Call trace: __list_add_valid+0xfc/0x140 insert_work+0x78/0x1a0 __queue_work+0x500/0xcf4 queue_work_on+0xe8/0x12c md_check_recovery+0xa34/0xf30 raid10d+0xb8/0x900 [raid10] md_thread+0x16c/0x2cc kthread+0x1a4/0x1ec ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 This is because work is requeued while it's still inside workqueue:
If the workqueue subsystem can have such problem because of md flag, then I have to think workqueue is fragile.
t1: t2: action_store mddev_lock if (mddev->sync_thread) mddev_unlock md_unregister_thread // first sync_thread is done md_check_recovery mddev_try_lock /* * once MD_RECOVERY_DONE is set, new sync_thread * can start. */ set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, &mddev->recovery) INIT_WORK(&mddev->del_work, md_start_sync) queue_work(md_misc_wq, &mddev->del_work) test_and_set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT, ...)
Assume you mean below, 1551 if(!test_and_set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT, work_data_bits(work))) { 1552 __queue_work(cpu, wq, work); 1553 ret = true; 1554 } Could you explain how the same work can be re-queued? Isn't the PENDING_BIT is already set in t3? I believe queue_work shouldn't do that per the comment but I am not expert ... Returns %false if @work was already on a queue, %true otherwise.
// set pending bit insert_work list_add_tail mddev_unlock mddev_lock_nointr md_reap_sync_thread // MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING is cleared mddev_unlock t3: // before queued work started from t2 md_check_recovery // MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING is not set, a new sync_thread can be started INIT_WORK(&mddev->del_work, md_start_sync) work->data = 0 // work pending bit is cleared queue_work(md_misc_wq, &mddev->del_work) insert_work list_add_tail // list is corrupted This patch revert the commit to fix the problem, the deadlock this commit tries to fix will be fixed in following patches.
Pls cc the previous users who had encounter the problem to test the second patch. And can you share your test which can trigger the re-queued issue? I'd like to try with latest mainline such as 6.3-rc3, and your test is not only run against 5.10 kernel as you described before, right? Thanks, Guoqing