On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 8:08 AM NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > mdopen() will use create_named_array() to ask the kernel to create the > given md array, but only if it is given a number or name. > If it is NOT given a name and is required to choose one itself using > find_free_devnm() it does NOT use create_named_array(). > > On kernels with CONFIG_BLOCK_LEGACY_AUTOLOAD not set, this can result in > failure to assemble an array. This can particularly seen when the > "name" of the array begins with a host name different to the name of the > host running the command. > > So add the missing call to create_named_array(). > > Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217074 Hi Neil I have two questions, hope you can help to understand the function create_mddev better. Frist, from the comment7 of the bug you mentioned: There are two different sorts names. Note that you almost acknowledged this by writing "name for my md device node" while the documentation only talks about names for "md devices", not for "md device nodes". There are 1/ there are names in /dev or /dev/md/ (device nodes) 2/ there are names that appear in /proc/mdstat and in /sys/block/ (devices) Thanks for the clarification. But it looks like it doesn't work like what you said. For example: mdadm -CR /dev/md/root -l0 -n2 /dev/sda /dev/sdc --name=test cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid0] md127 : active raid0 sdc[1] sda[0] 3906764800 blocks super 1.2 512k chunks cd /sys/block/md127/md/ In /proc/mdstat and /sys/block, they all use md127 rather than the name(root) Before this patch, it creates a symbol link with the name root rather than test ll /dev/md/root lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 8 Mar 21 22:35 /dev/md/root -> ../md127 So "test" which is specified by --name looks like it has little usage. By the way, after this patch, the symbol link /dev/md/root can't be created anymore. Is it a regression problem? Second, are there possibilities that the arguments "dev" and "name" of function create_mddev are null at the same time? After some tests, I found dev can't be null when creating a raid device. It can be checked before calling create_mddev. And we must get a name after creating a raid device. So when assembling a raid device, the name must not be null. So the dev and name can't be null at the same time, right? Best Regards Xiao > Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx> > --- > mdopen.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/mdopen.c b/mdopen.c > index d18c931996d2..810f79a3d19a 100644 > --- a/mdopen.c > +++ b/mdopen.c > @@ -370,6 +370,7 @@ int create_mddev(char *dev, char *name, int autof, int trustworthy, > } > if (block_udev) > udev_block(devnm); > + create_named_array(devnm); > } > > sprintf(devname, "/dev/%s", devnm); > -- > 2.39.2 >
