Re: about linear and about RAID10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Wol, et al --

Just a couple of quick notes ...


...and then Wol said...
% On 03/12/2022 18:27, David T-G wrote:
% > 
% > ...and then Wols Lists said...
% > % On 03/12/2022 05:58, David T-G wrote:
% > % >
...
% > Or that's how I understood it in the very many RAID wiki pages and other
% > docs I read :-)
% > 
% Hmm ... so being pedantic about terminology that's a definite raid-1+0, not
% linux-raid-10.

OK.  I'll try rereading the wiki pages and see where I went wrong.
Perhaps they can be clarified.


...
% it to a true raid-10. You said you had plenty of spare 2TBs, so --replace
% one of your 4TBs onto a pair of 2TBs, then --replace one of your raid-0's

Er, no.  I have plenty of "less-than-two-terabyte" drives.  They are all
used as one-off drives for archiving content.  1T here, 750G there, and
so on all as second copies for an ~18T external archive disk.  But, no, I
don't have perfect lovely half-size disks waiting to bring into play (or
they would be holding archive content! :-)

Sorry for any confusion.


HANW

:-D
-- 
David T-G
See http://justpickone.org/davidtg/email/
See http://justpickone.org/davidtg/tofu.txt




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux