Re: Performance Testing MD-RAID10 with 1 failed drive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 06:51:41AM -0500, Roger Heflin wrote:
> The original poster needs to get sar or iostat stat to see what the
> actual io rates are, but if they don't understand what the spinning
> disk array can do fully redundant and with a disk failed it is not
> unlikely that the IO load is higher than a can be sustained with a
> single disk failed.

Though OP is using RAID-10 not RAID-1, and with more than 2 devices
IIRC. OP wants to check the performance and I agree they should do
that for both the normal case and the degraded case, but what are we
expecting *in theory*? For RAID-10 on 4 devices we wouldn't expect
much performance hit would we? Since a read is striped across 2
devices and there's a mirror of each so it'll read from the good
half of the mirror for each read IO.

-- 
https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux